View Single Post
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 02:58 PM
Starfury Starfury is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUTHisnotfacts View Post
I agree with the people on here ...

what I do not understand is this ?

If the object was found by Apollo 11 then how come NASA sent Apollo 12 so many miles away from the site that that this object at ?

If I was NASA and I found this object I would have sent all the Apollo 11 12 13 14 15 all to the same location ...Then later on they could have sent them other places after they had went over the landing area of 11 real good to find everything that was there in area and on the dust .

final answer .........

If they found this object with 11 why not send 12 back there ?
A. There is no such object. That article is from the Weekly World News, whose writers and editors wouldn't know the truth if it sat in their laps and called them "Mama". Nothing written in that rag has ever been the least bit true.

B. If you want to learn about the moon, landing in the same spot over and over makes absolutely no sense. You need samples from different regions of the Moon to really learn about it.

@Paul Beardsley - I agree with you about the farcical nature of this post. However, I felt the need to try to set the poster straight about where the article came from. Probably an exercise in futility on my part though.

Last edited by Starfury; 09-May-2009 at 03:02 PM.. Reason: waffling
Reply With Quote