Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
As required by the rules of this board, please present conclusive evidence that "the object" was the "cause of the interference", or retract the claim.
|
My claim, RAF?
The second line in the wiki article on the Tehran incident states:
"The incident is particularly notable for the electromagnetic interference effects observed on aircraft in close proximity to the object: two F-4 Phantom II jet interceptors independently lost instrumentation and communications as they approached, only to have them restored upon withdrawal, and one of the aircraft also suffered temporary weapons systems failure while preparing to open fire. The incident is well-documented in an U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report with a distribution list that included the White House, Secretary of State, Joint Chiefs of Staff, National Security Agency (NSA), and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Various high-ranking Iranian military officers directly involved with the events have also gone on public record stating their belief that the object was not terrestrial in origin."
I suggest you take it up with them.
__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill
|