Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift
It is also possible for a pilot to report something that is "factual" (they report what they believe to be the facts) and also wrong (in the absolute sense).
|
Certainly.
Quote:
|
The claim that these UFOs are ETs is an extraordinary claim. For me to believe such a claim, it would require extraordinary proof. This is not extraordinary proof in my opinion. Therefore, it is more likely they are mistaken.
|
I don't find it extraordinary when physics and astrophysics theories arguably suggest Earth should have been visited by now*. Considering the age, size, makeup of the universe, the fact that we ourselves have become a spacefaring species in the blink of an eye evolutionarily, considering what M theory and superstring may offer the ETH, as well what recorded human history suggests (UFOs and beings from the skies abound).
I tend to think applying "extraordinary" to the ETH or visitation is remnant-thinking of 20th century science.
Don't get me wrong though, I don't think UFO cases are "proof" by any means, only that they may be suggestive of visitation.
* "Inflation-Theory Implications for ET Visitation" JBIS, Vol 58, pp 43-50, 2005