I already pointed out that the investigation was poorly done. It has been pointed out by a number of legal scholars that they would never have been able to convict Oswald. There were jurisdictional issues, chain of custody issues, and several other problems that would have made a lot of evidnece inadmissable, or at least questionable.
This is classic fuel for the conspiricy theorists. The less evidence there is, the more it proves their point.
The fact that the examiner had not experience with gunshot wounds does not prove anything. A rifle shot at that range with FMJ ammunition would produce a through and through wound at any range in question. All they would have to determine is which was the entry wound.
The investigation of the Kennedy assasination was the Grenada of police work. It should have gone to the local police, but naturally all of the feds wanted control of the investigation, with the result that no one was in charge.
__________________
The pavement is evil, and it must be punished.
|