Quote:
|
This is your opinion, rather than a fundamental principle. Yes?
|
I don't think so. Mnemonics suggests certain order already inherent in language: we use base words and suffixes. Phonology, and even the idea of any kind of unified human mythos, suggests a sort of fundamental principle. For instance, "na" is an expression of negation in many independent languages. The world offers much of the same repertory of sound across the globe: the sound of birds, chopping wood, water running.
Quote:
|
So you propose a continuous process of renaming?
|
Sure; languages, belief systems, educational curricula, cultural identifications undergo constant change. Hopefully for the goal of improving, or at least adding interest.
Quote:
|
Indeed. So the word Easter has multiple associations when spoken with reference to Makemake. A pun, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is a word used so as to "suggest two or more meanings or different associations". It may not be as laboured and excruciating as the puns in childish jokes, but it's a pun nevertheless.
|
Okay.
Quote:
|
Of course. There's something of a cottage industry in ignoring the IAU these days. But I think your first aim must be to convince us that we should ignore them.
|
The above words are in large part aiming at that.
Quote:
|
And the other half is male. Venus does a terrible job of representing them. She does an even poorer job of representing the sex distribution of the gods. We can find a reason to reject any name we dislike, if we use your "sampling" argument.
|
I think you are supporting my specific argument there. If you were to throw a dart randomly at the map of excellent sea-faring people, you'd be unlikely to hit a Rapa Nui person symbol. If you were to throw a dart at a sex category representation, you'd be just as likely to hit a male or a female. Now the question becomes, Does the Rapa Nui godhead best fill an important place in the planetary pantheon sequence?
Quote:
|
More to do with attractiveness and love in Latin, I think. But this is a parochial argument based on the happenstance that you speak an Indo-European language. Why should speakers from other language groups be impressed?
|
Certain other groups should most definitely also be represented where significant. One can however show that Latin is to a certain extent consistent and ordered. It has been useful for this for a long time, and has been used by the West as a common language, even to the exclusion of other excellent languages. I realize this sounds like an appeal to tradition, but it is not baseless. [addition:] For a global tradition, rename all the major bodies. (Certain other countries already do this.) I am only terribly interested in the parochial, for I only really understand the Western tradition.