Quote:
Originally Posted by grant hutchison
Phonosemantics takes this a little farther, noting word clusters with common sounds and meanings, unrelated to simple onomatopoeia. One can exploit this with invented words, as in the famous "bouba/kiki" experiment. Subjects exposed to these words for the first time, and asked to associate them with objects, would reproducibly identify the rounded, lumpy object as the "bouba", and the spiky, sharp one as the "kiki". This happens with subjects who speak languages from many different language groups. Does it go back to the sounds of lumpy and sharp objects interacting with the environment? Maybe. But there are other examples that are purely visual, like the "gl-" group that associates with light sources (gleam, glitter, glister, glisten, glow, glint, in English).
|
Maybe we should just take an idea from fiction. In
Stargate: SG-1 the Ancients use a series of symbols to identify coordinates for a planet. In one of the later episodes, we learn that the symbols have a phoneme and the destination has a name that can be pronounced with the phonemes.
So, maybe we can take the idea above, use phonemes attached to numbers or metrics used to identify orbital elements and use that to produce a phonetically pronouncable name. What would we call such a system,
phonoelemetrics?