Quote:
Originally Posted by cjameshuff
But the favored SI prefix aside...I'd like to see some of the reasoning by which that conclusion is drawn from that starting point. It seems a non sequitur...or worse, deliberate misinterpretation of language. No, simultaneity doesn't hold exactly over small distances...so what? I see some statements of the obvious, some nitpicking at irrelevancies, and a statement of victory without any logical connection to the rest of the argument. RussT, where, exactly, do you show that SR is falsified?
|
I would suggest you do a search on RussT and read some of the threads he's been involved in. You might understand then.
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.
Neptune- The original Dark Matter.
The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth
|