Quote:
Originally Posted by tusenfem
First space-time is 4 dimensional, but it is a mixed thing, 3 spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension. The 3 spatial dimensions are expanding into a 4th spatial dimension.
For the rest, is there any evidence you can show that everything is expanding? Naturally, if everything is expanding then necessarily the density of everything would get smaller, however, it would be rather difficult to measure that because all our measuring rods would also be expanding. So, basically it seems like a non-verifiable or non-falsifiable theory.
How are you going to solve that problem?
Also, quickly scanning through your blog pages
|
It has to do with the creation of new matter, please read Topic D and I qoute...."Assuming that everything in the Universe is expanding in a three-dimensional pattern, such as the Earth itself, it implies that its volume is continuously increasing. If the rate of increase of the Earth’s radius is at 9.8 meters per second per second (9.8m/sec2), it follows then that its volume is also increasing, not only in arithmetical progression nor geometrically but rather, exponentially. In Physics, density is defined as the quantitative ratio between mass and volume. If one agree that the earth’s volume is continuously increasing in a fast rate without taking account of its mass, the Earth’s density will then decrease tremendously, making it so big and yet so light as a feather.
SELF- OPINION
One way to avoid this scenario is to re-examine the Steady State Theory and make some modifications. First, it is not necessary to create or form new galaxies out from the new matter that is continuously created in the Universe, a better proposal would be - this new matter is continuously created within the very fabric of the space-time continuum itself. It will imply that everything in the Universe also increases in mass due to this new matter that is steadily created within the already existing matter. Therefore, the density of the Earth would not fall tremendously but rather, remain constant."
It would be unfair in my part if you just skim the articles and made an early judgement...I even qouted in that blog that...
"I will also humbly admit that my highest math that I can comprehend are limited to the fundamentals of algebra and trigonometry only. But as Professor Hawking stated in the acknowledgement of his book, “A Brief History of Time”, he published his book so that even ordinary people can have the opportunity to understand his knowledge and opinions about the origin and the fate of the Universe."(see topic F)