Quote:
Originally Posted by sirjon
It has to do with the creation of new matter, please read Topic D and I qoute...."Assuming that everything in the Universe is expanding in a three-dimensional pattern, such as the Earth itself, it implies that its volume is continuously increasing. If the rate of increase of the Earth’s radius is at 9.8 meters per second per second (9.8m/sec2), it follows then that its volume is also increasing, not only in arithmetical progression nor geometrically but rather, exponentially. In Physics, density is defined as the quantitative ratio between mass and volume. If one agree that the earth’s volume is continuously increasing in a fast rate without taking account of its mass, the Earth’s density will then decrease tremendously, making it so big and yet so light as a feather.
|
As already mentioned by
Northern Boy if the Earth's radius is expanding my 9.8 m/s
2, and thus R = R0 + 9.8 t
2, then the volume of the Earth
will not expand exponentially but as the 6th power of time as the volume of a sphere is proportional to R
3, so first you will have to get the math right.
The Earth
will not be light as a feather, only the density would decrease, otherwise, the same mass would be in the ever growing Earth, and thus remain the same and not get any lighter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirjon
One way to avoid this scenario is to re-examine the Steady State Theory and make some modifications. First, it is not necessary to create or form new galaxies out from the new matter that is continuously created in the Universe, a better proposal would be - this new matter is continuously created within the very fabric of the space-time continuum itself. It will imply that everything in the Universe also increases in mass due to this new matter that is steadily created within the already existing matter. Therefore, the density of the Earth would not fall tremendously but rather, remain constant."
|
Whoah, stop right there! You only claim above that everything expands, nowhere have you yet said that matter would be continuously created. You are taking a leap here!
And where exactly would this matter come from?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirjon
It would be unfair in my part if you just skim the articles and made an early judgement...I even qouted in that blog that...
"I will also humbly admit that my highest math that I can comprehend are limited to the fundamentals of algebra and trigonometry only. But as Professor Hawking stated in the acknowledgement of his book, “A Brief History of Time”, he published his book so that even ordinary people can have the opportunity to understand his knowledge and opinions about the origin and the fate of the Universe."(see topic F)
|
Yeah, but unlike you, Prof. Hawking does have the mathematical and physical foundation to build on and make a consistent model of the universe without the necessity of math.