Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken from Dublin
Already we have photos of the tiny rover on Mars taken by orbiting satellites over a hundred million miles away, yet not one photo of any of the alleged far bigger six landing sites on the moon a mere quarter of a million miles away?
I'm only surprised they haven't faked them too by now, but maybe the will of the present generation working for NASA isn't up to promoting the lie any longer.
|
Okay........ a camera that is perhaps 100 miles above the surface of Mars can photograph a rover through that planet's tenuous atmosphere. So you expect Earth-based cameras to be able to photograph objects that are in reality not that much larger, from an average of 233,818 miles? That would require optics on Earth to be almost 2,500 times better than those NASA sent to Mars, not to mention better than the physics allow. The fact is that no telescope on Earth (or in orbit around Earth) is able to resolve an object the size of the LEM at that distance. Do the math.
Do you admit we've send unmanned missions to orbit and land on Mars, or is that also faked?
__________________
Where mainstream ideas can't be found,
some novel theories can be had.
But keep your feet both on the ground;
Sometimes the astronomy's bad.
You may see the cosmos through the noise,
But take care which path you choose.
Remember when reading conspiracy ploys,
A mind's a terrible thing to lose.
So keep your spider sense on high
And before they drive you to booze,
Take time to roll up your pant legs, boys,
It's too late to save your shoes.
|