As being one of the guys, I would like to state that I do not expect every member of BAUT to be an expert in (astro)physics. However, in order to come to a rather scientific board with a claim that goes contrary to what mainstream theories claim, I think it is reasonable to at least ask whether there is some mathematical basis for the claims that are being made (math being the language of physics).

And, no, not everything needs to be mathematical, if you can only come with some analogy or description that clarifies things, then we can work together. But if something is presented, that on further scrutiny seems to have many holes in it, well then it is end of the party, let's clean up.

I appreciate (I think) what you want to present here on the board, though I am still not clear whether it is your own idea or of someone else, however there seem to be many problems with your presentation.

__________________

Any comments in glorious red are to be considered in ModeratorMode.


善數, 不用籌策 (shàn shù, bù yòng chóu cè)
He who is good at counting, uses no counting tools
“A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is”
道德經, 二十七 (dào dé jīng, 27)