View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2009, 08:30 PM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 2,022
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 777 geek View Post
Just checking that calculation at the beginning of the movie. The dinosaur killer was 6 miles across. Let's call it a sphere of radius of 5000m. Let's also assume a density of 2000 kg/m³, the density of Ceres. That means the mass of the impactor would be around 10^15 kg.

Assuming that it came from a very long way away starting with a gravitional potential energy of 0. It falls to 6000km radius (the surface of Earth), which means a GPE drop of 7e22 J.

Converting this to that all important scientific unit of "nuclear weapon", we're stumped as to which one. Little Boy or La Bomba? Assume La Bomba, with a yield of 50 megatonnes of TNT equivalent and since a megative of TNT equivalent is 4e15 J, then that means the impactor transferred energy on the order of 350,000 "nuclear weapons".
Somebody did a comparison to the one which is thought to have killed the dinos, and came up with the one in the film being significantly larger. IIRC, their comment was, "That's not a dinosaur killer, that's a planet killer." as the level of destruction would wipe out the biosphere almost completely.
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04 K.I.L.L. S.M.U.R.F.S.
Tuckers! Automotive Oddities! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither. MachineCast Save the planet, by leaving it! "To be second in space is to be second in everything," LBJ.
Reply With Quote