I started three attempts at Private messaging before I said, "The heck with it, I'm just going to go ahead and post."

Don't Expect me to continue doing so.

But what I see going on in this thread is also a big part of forum drama which is oh, so common here on BAUT. And part of why, returning from my enforced hiatus from the board, I have had yet to post at all.

What dwnielsen said has been Perfectly Clear.

The author in question is flaunting pseudo-science using terminology that real scientists use. Playing to the popular notion on the laymans brain, he hopes to convince people that his pseudo-science is sound, not with evidence, but with fancy wording.

It is not falsifiable science.

That he is a "paid, respected government physicist" is used to lend credence to the mans claims, his lack of proper science notwithstanding.

dwnielsen cares for the same exact reason that the Bad Astronomer does, that Randi does, that JayUtah refutes CT's... Hello.

THAT was the message and the Intent.

It's clear as daylight. There's an old saying: RTFQ. It should not have taken 8 posts for that to be clear.