Originally Posted by snowflakeuniverse

Hi tjm220.
The reason the topic keeps coming up is because of experimental evidence. I know my post was long, and no one reads long posts, but I used my uniform expansion of space-time theory to resolve the issue.

What particularly distresses me about this is how cavalierly the effort of decades of a man’s work can be ignored. There have been a number of Astronomers who have dismissed Professor Manuel’s work because it would force a reevaluation of the theoretical model describing the evolution of the sun and solar system. Which is apparently too preposterous to believe. This is the wrong way for science to move forward. If there is a mistake in Professor Manuel’s work, then prove where the mistake is in his analysis. If you can’t find any, then address the issue of modifying the astronomical model. The number of publications within the nuclear chemistry field describing his discovery is constantly increasing, and more nuclear chemists are determining that his evaluation is correct. He even has apparently convinced a few lonely astronomers he might be right.

Snowflake