Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ToSeek
Well, here's the Merriam-Webster definition:
Quote:
|
the divination of the supposed influences of the stars and planets on human affairs and terrestrial events by their positions and aspects
|
|
Well, as I said earlier I do not know what divination is. But my guess is that divination does not require a mathematical/geometrical model of the zodiac nor an integrated philosophical/theological corpus, to be practised. Astrology does though. Why?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ToSeek
If you want criticism, I would start with the following:
- There is no evidence that astrology works (in terms of predicting or determining human character, affairs, or events).
- There is no evidence for a mechanism by which it could work, i.e., how does a planet billions of miles away affect me in any noticeable way?
|
1. There is evidence. If you are a little patient I will present its rationale in the next days.
2. There is evidence about a mechanism. It is called the Logos concept (I will explain later on what this is). For now, a question:
Have you ever ever considered that the stars and planets of outer space, are not accidental balls of fire/earth that are just randomly lying there, casually and coincidentally? Has anyone ever considered the possibility that they might be living organisms? Lifeforms of a different scale? Of a different world? With a life span immensly greater than ours, so we cannot claim that we have observed them for any worthwhile amount of time, considering their cycle of existence?
Just a question.