You mean Donna Tietze?

Yes, that's the gossipy story that's been passed among UFO enthusiasts for quite some time. Unfortunately Ms. Tietze has not made herself subsequently available for discussion or further questioning. Her story remains completely unsubstantiated.

Therefore we have no choice but to evaluate her credibility based on the plausibility of her story. And again unfortunately, her story is not plausible.

1. Someone who held a security clearance and who was privy to secrets which are still secrets would be extremely foolish to reveal those secrets on a public radio broadcast, especially those to which her clearance did not strictly give her access. This is tantamount to going on the radio and saying, "I set houses on fire," or "I am a child molester."

2. If an activity is protected by compartmentalized security, one cannot just "wander in" to the areas where that activity is being undertaken without presenting suitable credentials.

3. Her depiction of security procedures is laughably implausible. She claims she was given a guided tour of this facility and the work that was being done there, but the worker adopts a cloak-and-dagger approach when it comes to talking about details. This is not an accurate depiction of compartmentalized security. If she were not cleared to know everything that was going on there, she would not have been admitted to the room.

4. Her testimony regarding UFOs and Apollo missions and NASA spacecraft being "tailed" by alien spacecraft is third-hand hearsay. It also has nothing to do with the photographic alterations she claims to have witnessed in her earlier statements. She does not say she believes she is looking at pictures of the lunar surface, or any other Apollo mission. In fact, she gives indications (e.g., "pine trees") that she believes she is looking a photo of terrestrial terrain.

This is not compelling testimony. It seems more likely that she is telling exciting stories to willing and gullible audiences, not recounting what she actually heard and saw. Sorry, but you'll have to do much better than that.