View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 11:43 AM
resenmut resenmut is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: slovakia
Posts: 131
Default Proofs for Planet X

For Charlie from Dayton and for BoredHugeKrill, SirThoreth...

Dear Charlie, please focus your Telescope circa 12 degree above actual position of Uranus, plus minus 20 degree East, West. There are places where Planet X could be for 25 percents... If X is but dark small star (from some sort of dark matter..) only with big infrared telescope could be possible to find it. Ask some of your well known observatories for help. I tried to contact some, but they don't want cooperate. Maybe X was found, but because its small dimensions it is regarded for asteroid,...?!
Don' try to discredit humans history. You are from 200 hundreed years old nation, but there are observations, records which are thousands years old.
People had seen on sky objects, which are now billions km away. Records of such observations but were done by artists, scientiests other way, than now it is common. After many replications some motives were litle changed or complemented with decorative ornaments, but historical significance exists till now.
If you do'nt believe on crop circles, so read Tulis description of UFO from circa 1450 BC (reign of Tutmose 3th in Egypt), or some works of Julius Obsequinus, from 400 AD, where are many descriptions of contacts with extraterestrial objects too similar to present observations.
Why do you think, that oriental carpet can't be source of important information?
Have you seen gobelin (ta****erie) where wife of William Conqueror depicted battle at Hastings in 1066 with painted Halley comet, what is important proof for existance of regular orbital time of this comet? Carpets in ost countries, Russia are usually on walls like gobelins not on floors, because their historical value.
Visit me, I can show you more details, proofs from my "flying carpet" (can I so name my astronomical carpet?) but also other important proofs for X, we can discuss about it more...
Belt of asteroids (between Mars and Jupiter) small planets are on places, where probably was planet, or wasn't completly formed, it fits with Titus/Bode law.
Please describe what is wrong (if) on my validation for existance, reasons why planets are so arranged.
My model is physicaly and matematicaly correct. If it is not so, tell me exactly what is wrong.

Pavel Smutny
__________________
senmut