Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rift
Okay, we send a 800 million dollar probe to another planet, one that we know has a very thin atmosphere, colder then heck, no surface liquid water, and no oxygen, all facts we can gather from here on earth by any institution with a resonable size telescope, and NASA needs to fiddle with the color because they don't want folks to know that it really is more habitable then it really is...
Okaaaay
|
What does the shade of the rocks and sky have to do with habitibility?
If NASA wanted to skew the pictures & data to fool the public, they would make Mars look
more applealing, and maybe even make up evidence of life or signs of life. That would result in greater public support for goverment funding of more Mars probes and even manned missions.
My question for the woo-woos: Why would NASA cover up data about Mars as you allege when revealing everything
would be benefical to NASA?
Dancar