View Single Post
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 08:37 PM
daver daver is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squink
But if that were the case, we could approximate the LARGE spherical surface of the explosion with a tangent plane, and upon that plane all the galaxies would be moving away from the center of the sphere at roughly the same velocity, and have little or no recessional velocity with respect to each other. In other words, the observed redshifts of galaxies would depend strongly on their position within the sphere of the heavens. If the center of the explosion happened to be located in the direction of the line through the NS poles of the earth, then galaxies along the equator would show little redshift, with more northern or southern galaxies exhibiting a larger redshift as a function of distance. That?s not the case.
Hmm, I thought I glanced through another post which suggested this, but i didn't see it now. Anyway, I apologize if I've stolen someone else's argument.

You might be able to explain the current distribution of galaxies and redshifts if you postulate a pretty unusual explosion--one in which the amount of matter blasted out at a given speed is proportional to the speed squared. So if X amount was spit out at speed Y, 4X would be spit out at speed 2Y. That's a pretty bizarre distribution.
Reply With Quote