16-June-2002, 01:02 AM
|
|
Established Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 557
|
|
Quote:
On 2002-06-15 18:58, JayUtah wrote:
I was amused to see someone agreeing with him who claimed to be an engineer. I would love to have a conversation with this person and see exactly how much engineering knowledge he has.
|
I assume you mean this person:
Gary gjs4262@aol.com
had this to say
Being an engineer, I just really became aware of the moon potential hoax when it aired on 21 March 2001. It seems there is more proof on why it is a hoax than NASA can prove it is real. Very good view points on "points to prove". Most striking points are flag blowing, dust under rocket, various angles of shadows, rover blowing dust, you got me sold on a hoax!
or this person:
donalw@freesurf.ch
had this to say
So 30 years ago we were landing a vehicles 5 times the weight of a Toyota Land cruiser on the moon, and we seem to have problems landing a little craft on Mars today. As an engineer I look at the developments that have been made over the last 30 years. Considering where we have only got to today, the lunar landings have to be nothing more than a film directors most glorious hour. In engineering terms 30 years ago was prehistoric. The had almost zero computing power whatever about doing it once.. maybe but reproducing it 13 times….. Sound like a soap opera ! So where was all the money really spent !!! As a suggestion, could you add to each photo a link to the NASA page where the originals are held, allowing viewers to see the detail of this joke a little better ...
__________________
~AstroMike
|