You probably don't want to. He seems to have discovered Planet Ex while vacuuming his rug.

resenmut, I hate to break this to you (and I'm actually surprised that no one else really has yet), but Sedna can't be where you predicted Planet X to be, nor can it have the orbit you predicted. And the exact same sentences apply replacing "Planet X" with "Nemesis". Why?

Because you never bothered to predict where they were, or their orbits.

Here's some things to think about.

Sedna doesn't enter the solar system as we know it. It never gets anywhere near Pluto, let alone closer than it. It's not what you're looking for.

Sedna's period is some 3 times longer than what you claim Ex's period is.

Sedna is far, far, far, far, far too close to be Nemesis. If a star of any brightness were that close, it would have been noticed long ago.

Nemesis's proposed period is some 250 times larger than Sedna's.

Sedna's motion is not retrograde.

It doesn't have any of the properties you've claimed Planet Ex to have. You weren't thought of in the best of light before, you know, but now, by jumping on this band wagon, you've completely tarnished your reputation. If you had any real interest in your theories, you'd at the very least make them consistant with THEMSELVES!

__________________
"I'm making wheatloaf. It's like meatloaf, only with wheat"
"Isn't that just...bread?"