i cant really comment on the astronomical ones, but geological ones i can
Ok, pole reversals are in fact reversals, not weakening, its hard to mistake the orientaion of paleomagnetism with strength
Africa does fit, although i suspect that he expects all the countries to fit EXACTLY together as they appear to be today, and if you look at the geology of the continents, there has been significant change in their shape, india for axample has about 20% or more of its area underneath asia, go back a few million years and it looks much different.
And im not very clued up on carbon dating, but my understanding is that it doesnt matter how much C14 there is in the atmosphere (and therefore the creature) because it the ratio between what C14 is there and what it decays into, ie a large amount will show the same ratio as a small amount
and as a side note, go to his site and read the fag section, he shows a poor understanding of science but worse still, many of his explanations are from the bible, hes just another creation nonscience guy
__________________
Why do they call it 'common sense' when it isn't all that common?
|