Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yannox
Today, scientists doubt that the “primitive” terrestrial atmosphere had the highly reducing factor used by Miller, a point favoring the recent creation of earth.
|
Not hardly. Please take a course in simple logic. Haven't you heard of the null hypothesis? You're trying to foist a simple logical fallacy. Your reasoning is pathetic.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yannox
The Miller results led to the “primordial soup” theory, which assumes life arose in such a mixture of gasses and chemicals as Miller used...
|
Incorrect.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yannox
The alternative is the “unthinkable:” God created life!
|
What God? Where is this God now? Where did God come from? What's the exact mechanism that God used to do this "creation" you're claiming? If you had ANY empirical support for this claim, I'm sure science would be interested. Unfortunately, none has EVER been supplied. Why not?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yannox
But as long as atheistic scientists can find a way to get out from under that conclusion...
|
"Out from under that conclusion"? You can't have a conclusion without any evidence, observational support... Conclusions are based on something. God is a hope, a dream, a subjective feeling, a myth based on historical morality tales. You could use a course in comparative religions, too. Man, you are falling behind!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yannox
But as long as atheistic scientists can find a way to get out from under that conclusion, they will, no matter how extreme.
|
"Extreme"? Don't you think the wholly unsupported hypothesis of a "supreme being" directing the actions on our little planet isn't just a little "extreme"?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yannox
Is there any intelligent life left on Earth?!
|
This is an extremely funny question coming from someone who shuns intelligence, buries his head in the sand, and attempts to mislead everyone he meets into burying
their heads in the sand, too.