Hey Phil,
gee dont I get 3 strikes here at BABB?
OK , I have 2 strikes.
Better not strike out my first nite.
Thanks for letting me post.

In any case Phil,
I was just wondering if these comments by the aforementiond scientists
were of valid merit, and worthy of response here on your forum.

It seemed to me to be all pretty bold statements,,
Brown dwarves and all, or
"***so-far unseen planet is several times bigger than the largest known planet in our Solar System, Jupiter."

And why only one "unforeseen planet " ?
"several times bigger than Jupiter"

Like I saked earlier Phil,
if there is something that large or massively gravitational out there,
would it have a stable orbit,
like Sedna supposedly has,
or could it be what Sedna actually orbits towards in its unusual elliptical orbit,
and all that "second foci point" binary star proposal,
Or can we safely assume that it could also easily be a giant rogue planet , or even massive brown dwarf with another Sedna style orbit intersecting with the planetary alignments?

with the huge comets Hale-Bopp and NEATV1, coming virtually one after the other, it is not hard to imagine that something bizarrely huge or massive could come by as well, with an entourage of NEATV1s as a predecessor.

Every time these astronomy and physics Drs bring out more
"speculations" derived from scientific analysis,
on these huge outerplanets/brown dwarves,
the more Sitchin and Velikovsky sound right on the money .