View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 25-April-2004, 08:24 PM
iantresman's Avatar
iantresman iantresman is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AGN Fuel
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnOwens
I note the obligatory whinging about the peer review process on the "timely announcement" link
In other words, thank heavens I know longer actually have to provide any real evidence for my ideas, given they can now be accepted unthinkingly by the same people that bring you GLP! So much easier!

In an ideal world, criticism of peer review would be just joke. In reality, it can fail because peers are human. Yes, it is a rare event... unless you are on the receiving end, and your work is effectively banned.

A good example is criticism of the Big Bang theory. Whether the theory is right or wrong, scientists should have the opportunity to freely and openly criticise it. This is not the case. See the article at http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=zj49j0u7

Regards,
Ian Tresman
Compiler, Catastrophism CD-Rom
www.catastrophism.com