21-July-2002, 01:18 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 14
|
|
Quote:
On 2002-07-20 19:19, JayUtah wrote:
I wish I had saved the many examples of photo fakery that the researcher posted on the JFK forum. They were very compelling to say the least!
Well I did save the photos, and they are most certainly not compelling. They are, essentially, the most ignorant tripe ever assembled under the masquerade of "image analysis". The people "analyzing" them, in general, have no idea what they're looking at and no idea what physical laws govern those observations. It is not too strong a wording to say they are fantasy.
Your personal attack on one of the most famous photo researchers of this era is noted...and had neem passed tothe researcher.
Many have tried to debunk these proofs at JFK, some whom even mentioned this forum. None was able to disprove this research.
You can't debunk them at JFK. JFK Research is not an open forum. It is a forum intended to provide a basically unchallenged platform for Jack White and his associates. If you dispute White too strongly, you're banned from the forum. A real test of his research cannot be made under those circumstances.
Not true. Anyone is welcome to post their views at JFK if they follow the rules. Those who get banned forgot they cant engage in personal attacks on that forum.
Let Mr. White and his associates participate in open, unrestricted debate and see how far his "research" carries.
The debate at JFK is open and unrestricted.
As to the clavius site I have visited it and it looks to ne to be a front for NASA/CIA/NSA. Sorry...it the government spreading more disinformation.
LOL! That's my site. It's run by me and a few other volunteers out of a small ISP in northern Utah. Jack White tried to browbeat me into taking my pages down, and when he couldn't he just "concluded" I was some sort of front for the government. Not at any time has Jack White or his right-hand man Rich della Rosa been able to actually discuss the information on Clavius. They simply look for some fabricated excuse to sidestep it.
What a wonderful answer! You run a cover site for the US but you say its not. Priceless!
You need to spend some time with the works of Percy, Rene, Kaysing and Sibriel if you want the real truth.
No. Kaysing lies through his teeth. I presented my findings on David Percy's web site -- definite answers to most of his questions -- and he deleted them and now pretends they never existed.
I have spent time with the works of these people, and in some cases I have spent time talking to the people themselves. I am fully convinced these people not interested in any kind of truth, but simply in selling you their materials and making a quick buck before people like me and the other folks at this forum can expose them.
|
Thats one way to look at it. Looks like the good old USA is very interested in discrediting these truth seekers....why?
|