Quote:
|
Originally Posted by russ_watters
They are apparent paradoxes because if you approach (for example) an SR problem with Newtonian logic, you will see a paradox. The purpose of using the paradox as an example is to show how the theory resolves the apparent paradox..
|
Then why did Mr. E have to add acceleration and gravity effects during his own attempted “resolution” in 1918, since there are no acceleration or gravity effects in the SR theory?