View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 16-June-2004, 04:32 AM
Normandy6644's Avatar
Normandy6644 Normandy6644 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ithaca, New York
Posts: 3,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam5
Quote:
Originally Posted by russ_watters

They are apparent paradoxes because if you approach (for example) an SR problem with Newtonian logic, you will see a paradox. The purpose of using the paradox as an example is to show how the theory resolves the apparent paradox..
Then why did Mr. E have to add acceleration and gravity effects during his own attempted “resolution” in 1918, since there are no acceleration or gravity effects in the SR theory?
Don't do this again. I don't think anyone has any energy left for it.