Quote:
|
What am I supposed to do, just sit back and let you guys have all the fun??!
|
How can you call 50 odd pages of you not understanding what people have typed to you
fun?
Quote:
|
If there is no paradox, then explain why there is no paradox, because all you have said so far is, “Trust me, there is no paradox.”
|
SeanF, and others (many others),
have explained to you why there is no paradox. They've done so with words, they've done so with math. You disputed the words because you thought different things were being said, and the math you couldn't understand. That doesn't mean the paradox is unexplained, or real in any way. It just means you don't understand the explanation.
Besides, whoever said "Trust me?" The math is there, if you care to do it yourself.
Quote:
|
Then why did Mr. E have to add acceleration and gravity effects during his own attempted “resolution” in 1918, since there are no acceleration or gravity effects in the SR theory?
|
Because SR doesn't include those effects...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Normandy6644
Sure, there have been experiments that show that a theory's original scope is too wide, and that it is only applicable in certain places (Newton's gravitation, for example), but nothing has really destroyed a mainstream view.
|
Another example would be
Special Relativity.