22-June-2004, 05:43 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ithaca, New York
Posts: 3,091
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kjavds
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sam5
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kjavds
|
There is no “Stella-come-Alf” in the 1905 paper. There are no three moving systems. There is no third party adopting a second party’s clock reading as they move in opposite directions relative to one another. There are no space buoys stationary relative to the earth. There is no earth. In the “closed curve” thought experiment of Section 4, the K observer sees the K’ clock move in the closed curve, while the K’ observer sees the K clock move in the closed curve, so there is no “turn-around” of any single clock in SR theory. |
Since your post of 18 Jun 2004 00:18 you mentioned Einstein's "Section 4" but I don't know what's your beef because 12 pages is a lot of chatter indeed. I understand Relativity, circular paths or straight, and I disagree that there is any *unresolved* paradox. But circular path scenarios must be resolved with GR, there's no choice. Try me.
Personally I don't know why you have to constantly quote hundred-year old Einstein texts, since Relativity is finely polished NOW and hangs tough, and Einstein isn't the end-all be-all authority to cite.
Here's a good blurb I put together: bingo |
Nice website kjavds. Although somehow I think it will be futile in some aspects. :roll: But I still like it! =D>
|