Thread: Measuring time
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 25-June-2004, 12:25 PM
snowflakeuniverse snowflakeuniverse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 860
Default

Hi Ian Goddard

You said the following
1. If uniform expansion of mass & space, then uniform density over time.

According to the proposed relationship, a volume of “absolute” space varies to the square of the measure of Cosmic or Absolute time. What this means is that from our “eye of god” perspective, if the age of the universe were to double, the volume in our “balloon of reality” will increase 4 times.

The amount of mass within the “balloon of reality” is fixed, so there is a continuous loss of density in “absolute” terms. Relative measures of reality locally determined will detect no change whatsoever, if the expansion occurs according to the “rules” presented in the “Ratio of Times” formulas. Since all relative “rulers” expand with the expansion of space-time, all proportional or relative measures of distance measured “locally” will remain the same. This positing also shows that all measures of time also remain locally the same, even though from the “eye of God” perspective, all “clocks” slow with the expansion of space-time.

In order to understand my proposed model, it is important to differentiate between relative and absolute measures. As shown in this posting, all locally observed measures of distance and time remain proportionally the same. From the absolute perspective, (the “eye of God”,) lengths are proportionally increased and time slows.

Because all local measures of distance and time are measured to be constant, these measures have been assumed by the “mainstream” to be constant, even though they are actually changing, based upon an “absolute” perspective.

Snowflake