I didn't say it wasn't a mistake, I said it wasn't ironic. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

Well, I said it was a mistake. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

However, technically, the distinction between a "whistle-blow" and a "mistake" would be the intention of perpetrator.

That's the problem I have with Aulis's theory on whistle-blowing. Not only does he presume to know the intent of the perpetrator, he presumes that a perpetrator exists. I don't mean stuff like Diamonds Are Forever and all the stuff that just refers to moon landings. I mean the alleged anomalies found in Apollo materials themselves, which Aulis claims were "encoded" by the people falsifying the record.

Their case depends on first being able to prove the record was falsified at all. Then they can go about trying to determine who falsified it and why. They jump right to the juicy part.


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JayUtah on 2002-08-01 13:27 ]</font>