Quote:
|
Originally Posted by soupdragon2
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Archer17
Ever hear me mention the "soup two-step?" .. you just saw it :wink:
|
Well done Archer17, this is one of your more civilised posts. Keep it up.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The BA
Also, there have been a lot of trolls around lately, and my patience for dancing around issues is quickly being consumed. So instead of playing games, I strongly urge you to directly make your point.
|
Let me assure you, I am not playing games, and I trust you are not inferring that I am a Troll? But it's late here in the London, and I'm off to bed now. Apologies for the delay, but I'll be back (If I'm not banned in the meantime)!
BTW, I'm flattered that you have deigned to challenge me directly. Jerry Jensen laid down a challenge, as I recall, in relation to the Big Bang, a subject on which I am sure you are much stronger. As far as I am aware, he is yet to enjoy a a similar rejoinder.
Tally Ho! |
Again, your famous two-step. You managed to take two seperate posts that referred to you both directly and indirectly and managed to escape without commiting yourself.
All we want from you in the context of this thread is
your defintion of Falsifiability.
While most of us don't consider you a troll, you are getting dangerously close to that line. You make wild accusations, fail to provide more than one or two easily disproved examples and said that the BA, despite having a PhD and a decade of scientific experience cannot fully grasp this concept. All that I might add, without saying "why" or answering the simple question of what you think falsifiability means.
Why do you expect answers to your questions when you can't answer the question that forms the basis of your arguement?
[/i][/u]