View Single Post
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 13-July-2004, 01:33 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: "a lot of scientifc theories are not falsifiable&qu

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disinfo Agent
Quote:
Originally Posted by soupdragon2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disinfo Agent
If there is no way to test the theory, then it isn't exposed to fasifiability at all.
Oh, dear. I can see this going to be tough. If a theory cannot be tested, it is not falisfiable. It is illogical to say that if it can't be tested then it is not exposed to...
I thought you were only going to address the issue of the falsifiability criterium for a theory to be scientific.

I once made the point that testability can be a bit more general in this forum, though that also depends on what one understands by “theory”.
Perhaps you should give us your definition of "theory" as well...
Disinfo,

Perhaps this link sums up what's really been going on here, at least on one side. Or at least the most amusing song in a particular musical about Texas, as sung by Charles Durning.

__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.