Quote:
soupdragon2:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
...I suggest you choose your next post's words with care.
|
I trust that, by implication, this extends to all contributors to this thread, especially while it is under close scrutiny by the powers that be.
|
Most of us always do. You however have chosen to beard the lion in its den.
Quote:
cyrek1:
The BB is easily falsifiable but not in the minds of the supporters.
By the way, why does a theory have to be falsifiable to be scientific?
It seems to me that science is supposed to be portrayed as the truth.
Is the truth supposed to be falsifiable?
|
I think you mean "easily falsified" not "easily falsifiable."
Which brings up an interesting observation--there are a lot of people posting that these theories have been actually
falsified, whereas in this thread here we [have] a statement that that is not even possible--that the theory is not only not false, but it's not possible to show it false.
PS: Added "have"