Quote:
|
A zero net force does not preclude acceleration if one of its components is inertial force. Only if the sum of all impressed forces is zero will the acceleration be zero.
|
and this means that inertial force is not real [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
that was too easy.
heh, that was quite the circumlocution there, but it still does not make your conclusion above valid, let me requote it
Quote:
|
the net force acting on any body is always zero
|
and let me quote something else
Quote:
LAW III. To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or, the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts.
Whatever draws or presses another is as much drawn or pressed by that other. If you press a stone with your finger, the finger is also pressed by the stone.
|
the law is talking about the force interaction of two seperate bodies, your conclusion is talking about the forces on a single body. one does not lead to the other.
Your methodical over quotation of Newton still dose not validate your point, and from what i can tell, it seems to be just a way to out talk your opponents, which i don't think will work on this board.