It's an interesting compilation, but a few of them are stretches to be called hazardous.....just a few random thoughts looking through the list:
Quote:
|
STS-36. Launch delayed due to illness of crew member.
|
How does this differ from any other scrub?
Quote:
|
Apollo 9.......If rendezvous and docking of the Lunar Module with the Apollo CSM had failed, the crew would have been stranded in orbit.
|
Is this correct? Wasn't one of the objectives of the 2-man EVA to investigate the possibility of spacecraft to spacecraft transfer? Even just station keeping (as opposed to docking), would such transfer not have been a contingency?
Quote:
|
STS 1. The only time a new spacecraft was launched manned on its first flight. Many thought it would be a disaster.
|
And they were proven wrong.
Quote:
|
Apollo 15. One of the three main parachutes failed, causing a hard but survivable splashdown.
|
From memory, the failure of one of the chutes caused a ~5 mph increase in splashdown velocity, which was well within safety parameters.
Quote:
|
Gemini 5. Fuel cell problem led to cancellation of experiments, extremely boring free-drift mode to meet duration goals.
|
However, there was no danger to craft or crew.
There is no doubt that space exploration is a hazardous pursuit. However, the words of Gus Grissom still resonate:
"If we die, we want people to accept it. We're in a risky business, and we hope that if anything happens to us it will not delay the program. The conquest of space is worth the risk of life."