It seems our friend Phip is truly a BAD Astronomer. He apparently does not keep up with recent astronomical discoveries. Maybe he just doesn't like reading. I kind of got the impression of his quotes from Lieder that he just skims. Anyway, my point is that he seems to be unaware of a recent discovery by two separate teams of astronomers, one in the States and one in the UK. I have a copy of the press release as an html page. I will try to post it if I can in original form. They both state that they think they may have found what may be a tenth planet or a dead twin of the Sun, a Brown Dwarf ??? Isn't that what the guys from NASA said, that they had found something. Is it possible the NASA dudes jumped the gun with their press release ??? and then told to keep a lid on it, hence a re-release that allowed for another explanation. One fellow says he's a betting man and claims there's a 50/50 chance that there is something out there. One theory I've heard from the Doomsayers,as Phip calls them, is that there is a dead twin star and Nibiru is a rogue body that was captured by the two bodies, the Sun and the Brown Dwarf. Having two large bodies in close proximity (ie binary system) would allow for a greater possibility of a capture of a rogue body, Nibiru. I myself would be quite skeptical of such a story (Return of Nibiru) if there wasn't such a large body of geological evidence to support poleshifts. Poleshifts are REAL but I'm not nessecarily saying that Nibiru is responsible, however it is a reasonable possibility. There is also a wealth of documentation that most dismiss as myth or legend that indicate some sort of scenario such as this. There's Sitchin's translations from the Sumerian cuniform text. Another disturbing account of this event comes from several native North American lore and legends. Now what would these natives have to gain from supporting this story if they have even heard of it on todays info highway ??? These accounts come from elders not young natives and I don't believe that ANY of them use the internet so how would they know of Lieder or Hazelwood. Speaking of Hazelwood, I do agree with our BAD Astronomer that he(Hazelwood) is an idiot and doesn't know squat about science. He is a con and that's it, he's just using this as an opportunity to make some dough.
Getting back to the physics of this thing, if there is a dead twin to our Sun and a rogue in orbit bewteen the two,consider this; what if the orbit is like a figure 8 between the two main bodies. How would you predict what orbital behavior the rogue would exhibit ??? How can you do calculations without all the variables ??? Even if there is only one rogue with no dwarf twin, you still don't have all the variables to make an accurate calculation of position and speed. One thing that bugs me more than a bunch of doomsayer crackpots spouting about the end of the world from some far-fetched Rogue planet scenario...is scientists spewing what they are calling hard science when they themselves are not working with a full data set. You're (Phip) just as bad as they are, actually a bit worse just because most scientists are very close minded and I really detest that. It seems thinking outside of the box is foriegn and unpalatable for them. One thing that comes to mind about scientists being close minded is the topic of anti gravity. They don't even acknowledge that it exists. In a Universe overflowing with dualities, according to science gravity is and anti gravity is NOT. Hmmm ??? These guys are really on the ball. Most physicists say that gravity is a force...well I say it is an effect from the flow of energy, not a force. If this effect can exist in one direction why can't it exist in another ??? Anti Gravity . . . anyone ??? Even if you call it a force why can there not be an equally powerful force in opposition to gravity. I remember reading some articles about a lot of strange gravitic behaviors being discovered about asteroids. One in particular is of asteroid pairings and why they don't behave as astro-physicists think they should. Is this an example of scientists not knowing all there is to know about gravity and it's effects and that should include anti-gravity as well. These asteroids seem to be doing strange little dances among themselves and the scientists can't figure out why they just don't crash into each other. A powerful and opposite effect to gravity maybe ??? Good ol Phip seems to know a lot about gravity but I bet he can't explain this one. I don't claim to know much about gravity except that I can and have build a device that could possibly demonstrate this effect. I'm not a scientist but it seems I understand more about the Universe than most. I'm a musician for God's sake not a scientist, Jim !!! Bones !!! Well my typing finger has worn out for the time being and I'll be going now. I actually spoke to Phip on the Art Bell show one night and didn't really get to say or ask what I wanted to. It was my first time on the air and was a tad nervous so I decided to join this board and speak my peace. Besides there wasn't enough time for me spout all of this eh ??? I'll be waiting anxiously for Phip to respond to this.

__________________
Anti Gravity and Zero Point Rule.
11:11
777
33
1