Good Go, Jerry! You've just rewritten Physics as we know it! Do I detect a hint of Morris Anderson's work here? I think it's a brilliant summation of all that we had come to believe, to paraphrase Aristotle, as "right and just", only to discover that we may have justified it wrongly. If we're missing "causation", then it's a big miss. There may be a very easy connect between gravity and emf, and we simply did not see it: they are the opposing ends of the same thing. Now, to make it all work, we need numbers... no small task!
Some of my favorites:
Quote:
|
Could all of the gravity wave be converted to electromagnetic forces? Would this explain the origin of cosmic rays? Cosmic rays have energies we cannot model with known mechanisms of nuclear forces, but if matter is composed of standing waves, and rapid disassociation this matter releases massive electromagnetic radiation, these waves would then demonstrate a causal relationship between cosmic EMF and gravity.
|
I think of these two are not only interactive, but inversely proportional. They are the same thing in opposing form.
Quote:
|
Galaxies can absorb as well as generate radio waves, and the frequency bandwidth of absorption/emission is proportional to the Gaussian size distribution of galaxies. This net Gaussian distribution creates a blackbody radiation that is called the cosmic microwave background.
|
This is more plausible than remnants of a questionable Big Bang.
Quote:
|
General Relativity is an ad-hoc model that does not address or assign causality. It has great predictive powers, but so do epicycles. It was just as rewarding to conceptualize, model and predict events using Ptolemy’s mathematical models as it is with Einstein's four-dimensional tensors, and almost as difficult. This does not mean they are accurate representations of reality.
|
Ptolemeic epicycles are still used in Astrology (some people really believe in this!), and they have predictive powers of finding where the planets will be in the night sky, though totally wrong. Einstein's time variable four dimensional space may also prove useful, but twisted.
Quote:
|
The solutions to the gravimetric and time dilation effects characteristic of general relativity can also be found using wave equations and slowing the speed of light as it enters a high impedance gravitational and/or inertial tensor, rather than warping space and time. This mathematically equivalent solution allows causality to be assigned to relativistic effects. It predicts we should see distant gravitational waves as electromagnetic, rather than seismic events.
|
The real test is predictability. Can we use this knowledge not only to predict cosmic events, but better still, to use this "gravitational waves cum electromagnetic energy" as an energy source in the future? If gravity is convertible, then the converse should also be true, where manipulating emf should yield gravitic effects. And knowing how clever we humans can be, once we get that solved, it's only a matter of time we figure how to use it to make motors, or propel spacecrafts. Once you can recreate a gravitic environment, then just manipulate the mass around it. With constant fast accelerations, velocities achieved can be immense.
As you pointed out, Einstein's predictions yielded valuable results. But we can do better, and move away from limiting interpretations that have us glued to this side of the future.
Nice, good insights. Now for the hard parts, to calculate it, and to make it work.
Cheers! Ivan