Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry
In order to keep a resemblance of the Einstein deSitter cosmological model in place, theorist have had to introduce... [numerous parameters]
|
This should not be surprising, particularly since - as Tony Rothman puts it - "Einstein's equations do not specify the universe; rather they may be considered a general framework within which you can construct many different model universes."
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry
On the subatomic scale, things are not much better: Virtually all of the four percent of the mass of the universe we consider ‘real’ (baryonic) is tied up in the Higgs boson, which has not been detected.
|
This is a very skewed and misleading way to put it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry
In other words, everything we think we know defines less than one percent of the mass fraction of the universe! Can’t we do any better?
|
This is a scientific argument?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry
...Replace this with the concept that time is constant and the speed of light does very, in Lorentz transforms proportions to both gravitational and inertial frames of reference. Mathematically, this is a valid solution to the Michelson Morley observations...
|
Except, how does this square with the observed slowing of atomic clocks and the extended lifetimes of high-speed subatomic particles?