View Single Post
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 12-November-2004, 05:31 PM
Jason Thompson Jason Thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 912
Default

Quote:
Since NASA's claim has always been that we've been to the moon, isn't the "burden of proof" (a well-used phrase here I notice) on them to prove they did so?
LOL! What bit of the burden of proof have they not fulfilled? Live transmissions from the missions? Check. Thousands of photographs taken on the Moon? Check. Actual moonrocks brought back and universally agreed by geologists the world over to be genuine lunar samples that were picked up, sorted, bagged and brought back by a manned expedition? Check. Eyewitness testimony from everyone involved from various countries across the world? Check. Thousands or millions of pages of documentation about the hardware, mission profiles, personnel, etc.? Check. Actual hardware available? Check.

What exactly do they have to do on top of all that? That list of evidence will stand up in absolutely any court of law as virtually proving the Apollo missons were real, especialy given the total lack of hard evidence of any kind of fabrication in the Apollo record.
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Reply With Quote