I'll try to tackle a few things here:
from above site:
I can clearly see a shadow hidden by a small uplift of ground.
The following paragraph talks about surfaces and the authors belief in it being flat. The ground is clearly not flat even from a short glance at it. Very evident from the left photo, harder to discern from the right photo.
This one made me laugh:
Quote:
They set all the hoax believers straight on that one didn't they? LOL, I don't think so. That explanation, while being a perfect explanation for the above set of photos, actually PROVES that the photos below from the Apollo 17 mission can NOT be accurate and have to be fraudulent. As you can see we have the opposite effect going on in the photos below compared to what is happening in the photos above. In the photos below we have two foreground images that are shot from a nearly identical location, yet the background mountains have magically changed their viewing angle. How can this be? The folks at badastronomy.com have made it clear through their above explanation that you could walk several hundred yards in either direction and still have the appearance of the distant background mountains remain the same. Yet here we have the two shots taken within several feet of each other and the mountains have done a move of biblical proportions.
http://www.geocities.com/maxim_recoil/A17bgsame1.jpg
|
Its obvious the camera was rotated around the lander to get other angles. you are not looking at the same side. Notice the missing flag :-)
Another:
Its the same mountain range, just portions of the left frame have been cut off or camera moved over.
The rest is mere exposure of camera issues.
Now i would not i have absolutly no experience even close to Jays, but on a relative glance i could see many of his/her theories are absolutly...well baseless.
No new facts are given, nor explanations on anything else. Just picking and choosing facts and information.
[edited all image tags to save bandwith]