Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Evan
Quote:
|
Not sure what you're saying; Jerry isn't trying to confuse us, he's looking for constructive criticism. Other than Occam's razor, nobody has poked any real holes--a specific counter example or calculation error--in his basic idea yet.
|
Huh? He has the supposed Gee constant backward. Pretty big hole. He also claims in effect that the force of gravity varies dependent on the amount of mass it acts on, not just the distance. Since this is completely at odds with solid experimental evidence that qualifies as rather large hole. |
Evan: Thanks for stepping up to the plate for me. There is more that I consider...questionable...but am to lazy to doccument it all. Titians mass & density being different than NASA thinks is just one. :roll:
Thanks again my good friend.
