cyrek reply

Tim wrote
Why should we accept that the equation given is a valid model for the physical process? Can you show that, by using this equation, you can reproduce measurements of force applied by photons in radiation pressure? And what is the physical interpretation of the "force" as an electron changes orbits? After all, this is a purely Newtonian concept applied, where Newton's physics does not apply, so it certainly appears to be idle fantasy more than anything remotely "scientific".

reply
I said my modification of the 'Ampere rating formula' illustrated in most introductory physics books is the source of my equations.
Are you questioning this defined empirical evidence?

These two fields that would be attracting or opposing each other depending on the direction of current flow are used in the 'repulsive setup'.
The removal of one wire does not make the field around the other wire disappear. You are familiar with the basic nature of these magnetic fields.

The formula ia amended to comply to the real nature of the 'planetary concept' of the HA. I still accept this idea because it is the most probable and realistic.

Electrons in motion generate magnetic fields. You know that.
The electron has a defined distance of travel during these photon emissions. The photon pulses have specific wavelength dimensions.
This is the criteria I use.

The magnetic field patterns, like the electric field, are expanded between the poles and charges. You know this. This expansion is caused by an 'intrinsic force'.
This is the basis of my aregument.

This displaces the EoS concept because there is no 'empirixal evidence for its support.

__________________
aka Michael Cyrek