Cyrek reply

Papa
The Bohr atom explains the HA fairly well. QM is more applicable to more complex atoms or combinations.

The electron and the proton are particles well tested and explained. You have two particles that attract each other because of their unlike charges. These particles would naturally form a binary just like gravitational bodies. How else could they possibly exist?
This is an absolute certainty. There is no other way they can exist except in isolation as separate particles at higher temperatures .

Can you explain how QM would show the formation of the HA? I do not believe it would be any different.

I use the criteria specified because the Ampere formula determines the force between two currents set at a specified distance and determined for a certain length of the force fields that result from the currents involved. This establishes a relationship between the electron and the forces it produces.
This gives me an opportunity to determine the forces generated by adjusting different values for different conditions as I have specified.
I wanted to find out how strong a magnetic field a single electron would generate. This formula gave me that opportunity.

My argument has scientific validity because I base it on real experimental conditions.
There is NO EXPERIMENTAL evidence that supports the EoS. It is a fabricated concept to replace the Hubble Doppler observations which HAD to be replaced.
So, SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE for the EoS.

Travis
GET REAL.

__________________
aka Michael Cyrek