Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Glom
Yes but because the system is chaotic, it means that the consequences could be anything...
|
So, what you are saying is that, because there are many factors involved about which we may know little or nothing, we should treat the things that we [to an albeit limited extent] do, as though they are
nothing to do with us: Nature will provide?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Glom
[T]rying to prevent one particular scenario that may or may not happen is a distraction from preparing from all manner of other scenarios that are just as likely to happen.
|
All I'm seeing with the anti-GWT folks, is a refusal to do anything other than to carry on as usual. There seems to be no intention of preparing for anything?
As Pteranodon says above: the evidence for GW itself is "undeniable". But, while the link to greenhouse emissions is still a matter of debate - what difference does it make? Would you rather we all prepared for an Iceage?
Are the affected flora and fauna mistaken? I'm sure that they are not being influenced by any scientific consensus; they are reacting to what's happening...But, then, they don't have time to argue over the semantics of the word "balance"...
