cyrek reply

Thanks Travis.

dgruss
I do not dispute what you say. A picture is worth a thousand words. Mathematics is important too. But math is limited only to those that understand the language. Everybody can understand a picture.

fortis
Can you draw a mathematical picture of how the atom radiates this wavelength?

My visualization sees an electron circling a proton (planetary style) to cause the proton to spin. This proton spin then generates a magnetic field. The electrons magnetic field resulting from its orbital motion interacts with the protons magnetic field. These fields are repulsive towards each other to stabilize the electron into a ground state orbit. As long as there are no nearby charged particles, this balanced state will remain that way.

There are free electrons in all parts of space that have been blasted out of the stars during the flaring activity. A wayward electron could be passing a HA in space to knock the electron to its deepest lowest orbital energy state which would weaken the electric attractive interaction between the two particles to make the electron radiate a 21 cm photon as it slowly returns to its ground state.

Physics is a product of experimental research that established observational behavior of the physical nature of particles and their forces that cause all the energies. The observations preceded the mathematics. Math was made to fit the observations and this gave it the ability to predict future experimental probabilities.
Granted, observations can be misinterpreted. But when the probability factor is included, the correct results can be accepted
I am inclined to believe that math has lost some of its credibility when abstract theories like ‘string’ and ‘inflation’ theories are accepted.
I use SI units because math uses SI units.
.
I understand that chemistry also uses QM but I am not interested in chemistry.

I am not interested in the details. The electron is the smallest fragment of electric current. It is measured by the strength of its magnetic fields in its electric circuits.
My formulation of the electron at the atomic level is a proper analogy of the ampere definition. I have proven that there is an intrinsic force within the photon fields to justify the intrinsic expansion.
Is the Bio-Savart equation necessary to understand the defined experiment of the Ampere?

__________________
aka Michael Cyrek