Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jamesd_wallace2
Lianachan, I am sorry about the confusion. That is why I normally state that I do not work for SLOOH. As a Slooher, I tend to think of SLOOH as my own. From what I have seen, many of the users feel the same way. Take for instance Nyx. He obviously had strong feelings about SLOOH and he is a subsriber just like me.
Many of us would like to see our user numbers grow for the express purpose of expanding the capabilities of SLOOH. We often talk about what SLOOH could do with scopes scattered thoughout the globe. 24/7 starry nights. SLOOH has plans to install more domes in the near future, but needs more customers to expand.
If you have questions about SLOOH I can try to answer them. I would like to continue the dialog that has just begun to start.
Keep Looking Up.
jamesd_wallace2
|
Yup - it's easy enough to refer to a community you belong to as "we". Sorry if my post came across as accusing you of working for SLOOH - that wasn't my intention, it was a "thanks for clearing it up" kind of thing (just phrased clumsily).
I'm sure others may ask you, but I have no questions about SLOOH. I'm afraid I am not at all interested in them for a few reasons - not least of which is the way the poster here of that name conducted himself in another thread. Extremely poor PR, and attitude - he may have alienated some potential customers by his posting here. Hardly what he had in mind, I'm sure. Also, I agree with Jigsaw that it's not really worth paying $50 for something that is not - at the moment - substantially better than simply looking at APOD.
Oh yes - I'm in the UK, so I lose the "benefit" of being able to look at the stars on SLOOH while it is daytime for me.