View Single Post
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2005, 09:10 PM
synthomus synthomus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mitropa
Posts: 137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistermystery
Quote:
Originally Posted by synthomus
It will have instruments for remote chemical analysis. If that's not exciting, then what is?
MSL for instance to name one is much more packed with various instruments
I share your enthusiasm for the MSL and can't wait to see it getting launched. Yet it's a sophisticated rover that needs development time. If there was a tradeoff between an overhasty development timeline and the chance for better testing (and perhaps sending two MSL at once! =D>), I would even favour to postpone the launch to 2011. Though I hope that won't become necessary.

Anyway, I remember the long and dreary post-Viking years, so I know to cherish the current approach of using every launch window to Mars. I wish we had a similar dedication in exploring places like Europa and Titan as we have in visiting Mars!

:-k To resume the water issue, does anyone know which probe will be more powerful in detecting underground aquifers: Mars Express (once its antenna gets deployed) or MRO?
Reply With Quote