I guess that's one of the problems with many ATM'ers. They not only have a notion that the current theory iswrong, but they also have another one that is better.
Unless you are very certain (not in the ignorant way but in a way of 'I have done all the hard science, I understand the current theory completely, I have clear indications that the old theory is wrong, and I have done enough observations and calculations to make my new theory believable), wouldn't it be better to just question the old theory, full stop?
I mean (no offense to the people involved, I just use it as an example): instead of saying that because Pioneer 10 and 11 have an anomalous acceleration, Newton was wrong, just ask what could be the reason for that anomalous acceleration. Perhaps give some hints, but stay low profile, not anatgonistic: chances are that a perfectly reasonable answer will come forth, and everyone can move on without heated debates and bannings and whatnot. If no good answer comes forth, perhaps launch a 'what if', 'could it be that?', ...
What I mean is: don't come rushing in banging on the doors, but tread gently. There's much more chance that you can tear down a theory bit by bit than that you can give it a fatal blow in one post or thread
